North Richmond News

Thoughts on Style Weekly’s Barton Heights article

February 4, 2010 · Posted in , ,

Yesterday, Style Weekly ran an article spotlighting the changes in Barton Heights and some of the issues newer residents in the neighborhood are facing. Many young professionals are drawn to the beautiful houses in need of some renovations, but encounter “tensions” when they move in.

When the weather warmed up, what they perceived as drug traffic intensified, and then there were the teen parties at the Cultural Diversity Center on North Avenue. On weekends, the parties would let out after 10 p.m., sending throngs of unruly teenagers into the streets. There were fights, sometimes gunshots, Lauren says, often in the alley that ran behind their house.

The article mentions the kerfuffle over The Men of Barton Heights flyers:

The [Men of Barton Heights] tournament, which brought hundreds to the park, caught some neighbors by surprise. They called police. The incident outraged Day, who says the calls were racially motivated, likening it to how “blacks were treated in this same neighborhood some 40 years ago, at a time when young black men were profiled as criminals and drug users and our young women were profiled as prostitutes,” in a flyer distributed throughout the neighborhood. “These elements have come into our neighborhoods with an attitude of dictatorship.”

But is calling the cops the first and best option? One reader and neighborhood resident writes in response to the Style Weekly:

The tone used in describing the instances of new white people in the neighborhood calling the cops is normative, and thus reinforces the idea that calling the police is a good thing to do. There does not seem to be any question of how that affects the ability of these people to become part of a community. Neighbors that call the cops instead of having conversations with their neighbors are building obstacles to community.

The local blog Transitional Neighborhood Lowdown recently posted their thoughts on a similar issue, which offers a third perspective:

I have many friends, including myself, who had an inwardly defining moment after moving into our chosen transitional neighborhood. There comes a point where we all decided that “we’re not gonna take it,” and this neighborhood is now ours … I am not advocating replacement of a neighborhood, but replacement of values and attitudes. When there are a few bad apples, it spoils a neighborhood for the rest of the inhabitants, even for those who are apathetic.

What are your feelings on Barton Heights’ new residents? How should newcomers react to real or perceived trouble in their neighborhood? What is the best way to build a neighborhood?

The full text of the response letter to Style Weekly is after the jump.

Dear Style Weekly,

I’m a 23 year old white woman who managed to purchase a condemned and foreclosed home in Southern Barton Heights this summer through a combination of class privilege, white privilege, and luck. I’ve spent the past months renovating the property to make it fit for occupation, and it is now my permanent home. Before I bought this house, you might remember me from being involved in a project that involved squatting in one of Oliver Lawrence’s properties on Montrose Avenue. We were doing that in order to try and draw attention to the issue of housing justice in Richmond. Unfortunately, most of the coverage we received emphasized only the issue of blight. That was disappointing to us, because we did not want to be part of a gentrifying force, rather part of a force calling out capitalistic logic as unjust and oppressive.

What brings me to write you today is the article “Northern Exposure” by Scott Bass from your 2/3/10 issue. Upon reading said article, a ball of anxiety and upset grew in my stomach. I’m really nervous about the future of Barton Heights and Battery Park. There is the chance that these areas can develop as integrated areas of the city. But there is also the very real risk that despite the abundance of housing, upper middle class white people will take over the area culturally and politically, creating a situation that perpetuates inequalities and injustice. Some might say that the dominance of white men politically is already happening- look at both the men in charge of the Battery Park Civic Association as well as our City Councilman.

One of the first things that I saw as problematic in the article is the use of words such as “frontier” and “pioneer”. Both of these words are reminiscent of colonial times, white supremacy, and ideas like manifest destiny. Both of these words dismiss the value of people who already live in the Battery Park and Barton Heights neighborhoods, and places the importance on the new white people moving in. These words also make the newcomers seem to be brave and courageous, which implies that the people who currently live there are bad and dangerous. The dichotomy that the use of the words frontier and pioneer creates an underlying acceptance of white supremacy. If white people moving in are pioneers, then the people who already live there are the perceived savages.

I would like to see more of the responsibility for the racial tension on Northside placed in the hands of the new white people in the area. It was their choice to move to the area, and thus they ought to be the more accomodating party. If nothing else, it seems like good manners to show some deference to the folks who have lived somewhere longer than you. I would never suggest that this means you are obligated to always do what they say or want, but I think it does mean that newcomers should listen to their neighbors, and definitely be respectful.

The tone used in describing the instances of new white people in the neighborhood calling the cops is normative, and thus reinforces the idea that calling the police is a good thing to do. There does not seem to be any question of how that affects the ability of these people to become part of a community. Neighbors that call the cops instead of having conversations with their neighbors are building obstacles to community. It would seem from the article that the white people who are so sure that there are drugs being dealt in their neighborhood have never had a conversation with their neighbors about that issue or what is going on. While this is certainly a topic for further discussion, I will briefly say, that as an anarchist I see the police as a threat to communities and community building. Statistically speaking, police forces are undeniably racist, and the results of our ‘justice’ system reveal the huge economic and racial disparities in America today. Calling the cops is not a solution.

Again, the instance of white people who called the cops because of the Men of Barton Heights basketball tournament, reveals how racist, shallow, and uncommunicative these new residents are. Apparently these callers were incapable of simply asking someone what was going on, or of letting people in a public park exercise their right to be in that park. I believe that Lawrence Day is dead on in saying these calls were racially motivated.

Chris Hilbert’s comment about Day reveals another discouraging problem with racism in our area. Hilbert states that he can understand Day’s point of view because “‘He has seen an ugly part of our past in his youth’”. Unintentionally, I’m sure, this statement shows again the foundation of white supremacy and white privilege that white people too often approach issues of race with. Hilbert is saying that racism is in our past. Really? I’m sure that comes as a shocker to every person of color in the world. Racism over? Yea right. Racism isn’t over, the ugly aspects of racism aren’t over, and being color blind is just another way of saying you have the privilege to ignore race issues. Racism is something that all us white people need to work on.

What this article revealed to me is that the issue of race and class in Barton Heights and Battery Park is big and only getting bigger. Until the new white residents step up to learn how to be members of a community (which may mean stepping down from controlling everything), there will be these clashes. And the reflex that these new residents have for calling the police is only going to create more distance between them and existing residents.

We have a lot of work to do. Anyone in the area who has a recommendation or suggestion for what they would like to see from new residents or white residents is definitely encouraged to let me know. It shouldn’t be the responsibility of people of color to teach white people how to not be racist. Any white people who want to get involved in some workshops on white privilege are also encouraged to contact me.

17 Responses to “Thoughts on Style Weekly’s Barton Heights article”

  1. A little clarification here. The author responding to the Northern Exposure article said “It would seem from the article that the white people who are so sure that there are drugs being dealt in their neighborhood have never had a conversation with their neighbors about that issue or what is going on.” Please don’t make assumptions as this is simply not true. There have been many conversations with long time residents in the area and those same residents are the ones who pointed the activity out. These older residents and neighbors appreciate and applaud the fact that newer residents are actively reporting drug houses and trying to help make the neighborhood safe. Several of my older neighbors have told me personally they gave up calling the police because over time it was reinforced to them the police don’t care what goes on in these predominantly black neighborhoods. With the newer residents moving in this is starting to change.

    True it’s a shame it appears to be a black/white thing but the fact remains there IS communication between neighbors although I agree there needs to be much more. Being new in the community I personally don’t do anything to make myself stand out in a negative way with my neighbors and chose to communicate rather than jump to conclusions based on hearsay and make assumptions. To me a bunch of folks hanging out on a porch, front yard or corner is just that, folks hanging out. Hell, I had my share of hanging out when I was younger and unless I see something suspicious like money exchanging hands I don’t see any reason to call the po po.

    I applaud the fact that you consider yourself an anarchist but please don’t stir the pot by making assumptions that simply aren’t true.

  2. ccbham, your request of Mo is pointless. She lives to stir the pot. Sometimes it is to good effect; here I am not so sure.

  3. Hey Scudder-
    Who are you who knows me so well and thinks that all I want to do is stir the pot?
    I think offering a dissenting opinion on a topic that I feel strongly about, which in this case includes racism, gentrification, class issues, police issues etc., is not stirring the pot, but speaking up for what I believe in.

    I think it is also useful to point out that assumptions I drew from the article, are likely assumptions that other folks are drawing from the article. Of course I know not all white people are uptight snitches, but the article definitely portrayed that aspect of new people in the area. So we should still be having dialogue about these issues, because if we do not, then we are leaving people to draw conclusions from an article that seemed to not ask enough questions.

    And again, let me point out how fruitless it is to endeavor in conversation if folks insist upon hiding behind internet anonymity. Which makes it particularly low handed for anyone to base their resistance to my ideas on their idea of who I am. Because you are not giving me or anyone else the opportunity to know who you are, and then base our reactions on that.
    I’ll be home today and tomorrow in the snow, so come on by to chat, we have lots of tea. Its the neighborly thing to do.
    2005 Barton Avenue

    or call me
    cell- 300 0023
    home- 303 5449

  4. Ccbham- I would point out that I did use the word ’seem’ to note that the article lead the reader to believe that was how the white people were behaving. Thank you for revealing that to be untrue, I wish Scott Bass had not been so misleading.
    I would agree that there are a variety of successes and failures happening in our neighborhoods right now. But I would emphasize that we need to be vigilante on working on the problem areas. The power and influence wielded by upper/middle class white people is such that even if not all of them are being bad neighbors it can have a huge affect on the neighborhood.

    Calling the police on anyone for stuff like drugs or prostitution is something that I think is completely worthless- regardless of whether or not you are an old or new neighbor. I’m sure many folks are familiar with Prohibition, and how making things such as activities or substances illegal doesn’t actual stop people from doing them, just fills the prisons. The War on Drugs is basically just an epic failure that a lot of white people are making money off of. Calling the police is quite possibly the least effective solution to drugs or other non-violent crimes. Instead of calling the cops, volunteer at an after school program. Instead of calling the cops, have potlucks. Instead of calling the cops, tutor neighborhood kids. Instead of calling the cops, offer a sober space for people to hang out in. Instead of calling the cops, push to get more jobs available in your community. Instead of calling the cops, help people access clean needles. Instead of calling the cops, help people get access to safer sex supplies. Instead of calling the cops, start a community garden. Etc.
    The Prison Industrial System is a vicious cycle that DOES NOT stop people from committing crimes. Calling the cops is just going to at best move a drug house from one block to another. It is not a sustainable solution to ‘problems’.

  5. Someone has to stir the pot or you’ll have burnt food : P

  6. what?

  7. PriderockT says:

    Mo Karn, I like you, you have the right kind of attitude for interacting with a lot of people. And, I agree with you on many points. Including ” stirring the pot “! Also, you’re right. What’s the point of continuing a dialogue when people either don’t — or won’t — ask the right questins, or don’t ask enough questions.

  8. Elizabeth says:

    Just catching up on this community conversation. Point of clarification: wasn’t the issue with the basketball tournament not the basketball but all of the vehicles that were driven down into the newly renovated park across newly planted grass? I thought it was a parking violation issue and not a race issue. Is my memory failing me before middle-age?

  9. Elizabeth, you are correct. In fact a week before after a group of 60 people went into the park a cleaned up, pull weeds and put down mulch. That same day someone was down in the southend, basketball courts, with their car and was doing donuts in the grass. Then that weekend was the basketball tournament in which no one told anyone about even though Mr. Day came to a previous meeting and told the BPCA memebers needed to start coming to the basketball games. BPCA board asked Mr. Day to the members know so the members could come to the games.

    There appears to be number of mis-quotes in this article and it’s doesn’t show true relationships that exist in the neighborhood.

  10. Elizabeth, I don’t know the exact reason others called the police, but I do remember when I saw the event that it didn’t seem appropriate to have all those cars parked on the newly seeded grass. I didn’t call the police but I can understand why some folks might have been concerned about that issue. Probably could have been handled better at that particular time. It’s unfortunate that the miscommunication surrounding that event has become such a touchstone of controversy.

  11. Sorry I didn’t finish my thought, the reason for the call to the police was the cars were park on the newly planted grass.

  12. To me it sounds like an appropriate way to handle the situation, to put a non-emergency call tothe police. I could almost see approaching one or two people who had parked where they shouldn’t but I understand most people wouldn’t be comfortable doing that. Unless of course they were familiar with the people. It’s a shame the article isn’t clear on what happened that day and an even bigger shame people, both white and black, seem so ready to pull out the race card.

  13. It has been said many times that the only reason the police were called was because of parking on the grass to the just restored park. Mr. Day will not accept that as the reason for the police being called. He is and will probably continue to play the race card, no matter what the reason, even though the majority of the folks that called the police were in fact black and very long time residents of Battery Park.

  14. Elizabeth says:

    Just read through ALL of the comments on Style and am all caught up. Oh, my. I was quite confident I knew all about how the world worked when I was 23, too. A decade makes a difference.

  15. It is good that the issue about the basketball tournament has been clarified.
    Although it still seems silly to call the cops about cars parked on the grass.
    Hopefully we can all work on our communication and openness in the future.
    If we can learn how to express ourselves in ways less likely to make others feel defensive we can have conversations instead of confrontations.

    And Elizabeth, snide comments about my youth are unbecoming and unproductive. Argue against my positions if you disagree, but acting like they don’t count is immature and makes it difficult for us to talk. Pretty much no one appreciates patronizing attitudes or being talked down to. I don’t believe I know you, so it is clearly impossible for you to know all about my education, experiences, or reasoning. I am completely open to chatting with you or anyone else about these issues in person. I just expect to be treated with the same amount of respect with which I will treat you.
    Call me, 804 300 0023
    or stop by on the weekend, 2005 Barton Avenue

  16. Mo, you’re right. I don’t know you. You simply reminded me of myself from ten years ago when I had more time, words, passion, and energy. Though I’d say I’m still fairly young, I recognize how I use that time and those words differently now.

    My take on what is happening here: this is more about systemic change within the civic association, generational differences from WWII/Boomers down to X/Y neighbors, and socio-economic differences (lower vs. middle) than white supremacy. I also don’t see upper middle class folks moving in. I’d say the newcomers are still strongly rooted in (what’s left of) the middle class in this country.

  17. Jim Budziszewski says:

    I’d like to address something that was omitted from this article that I personally feel is important. The majority of my conversation with Scott centered on my outlook on the neighborhood which he suggested (and I admitted) was quite different take from what other newer neighbors reported. I should point out that my experiences only reflect from mid-June of ’09 to now compared to others residing here from 1.5 to 6 years or more.

    Admittedly along with being a bit naïve and tending to look for the good rather than the bad around me, I’m also a single guy without a wife or kids to look out for. That in itself may alter my perception of what’s going on around me and my neighborhood. Unless I have an obvious reason to fret I’m not going to since I feel I can take care of myself and only need to take care of myself. This has worked well for me over the years and I see no reason to change now. It should also be understood that I in no way discount or make light of anyone else’s personal experiences or perceptions in the same neighborhood and am only expressing my own based on my own experiences.

    I felt I explained in depth to Scott that I haven’t personally experienced the same things regarding the drug houses or blatant open exchanges as others have. I did admit my annoyance with the CDC parties but that’s moot considering the previous owner went bankrupt so it’s no longer a neighborhood issue although I will admit a need for a local community center. Initially after being made aware of drug houses, loitering, etc., both by new and older neighbors, I did look for and even considered what I saw as possible issues, but for the most part I haven’t let my imagination run away with me and I haven’t actively looked for the things others might have routinely look for. Again, if it’s not potentially harming me or my neighbors it’s not a problem for me.

    With the exception of one particular experience late one Friday night last summer where two different cars pulled up and briefly visited a house a few doors away from mine I haven’t seen what I could definitively call any kind of drug activity on my street. Yes I’ve seen a lot of activity consisting of folks hanging out, loitering and making noise but I honestly couldn’t assume anything illegal was happening.

    I explained to Scott that my feelings of people hanging out in front yards, on porches, partying, dancing on the sidewalk, laughing and joking is just that….people hanging and having fun doing it. Yes sometimes it’s annoying but you’ll have that living within the boundaries of any city. I’m sure some of my neighbors are annoyed by my friends and family hanging out on my porch talking and listening to music while we sip (or in my case gulp) on alcoholic beverages. Unless I see some kind of obvious drug activity going on I just assume it’s folks hanging out. I see no need to call the police unless people are being very disruptive late at night or I see something that could actually be illegal or drug related.

    My philosophy with dealing with my neighbors is to not make myself a target by causing trouble unless I have a very strong feeling what I’m seeing is potentially dangerous to me or those around me. If I see or hear something worrisome I won’t hesitate to call the police and report it, like I and others did Christmas night when gun shots rang out very close to our houses.

    It took me longer than I’d like to admit to be in a position to buy an awesome house in what I consider an awesome neighborhood. I plan on staying here for a long time and would very much like to get along with and earn the respect of my neighbors rather than be looked at as a trouble-maker or have fingers pointed at me every time the police show up on the block for something.

    I plan on continuing getting to know, look out for and learning to respect the differences of the people who surround me which hopefully will help them to eventually learn to respect and look out for me as one of their own. In my opinion that’s what makes a good neighborhood regardless of where it is or what goes on in the areas surrounding it.

    Although I enjoyed the article and felt it was a really good piece I would have liked it better if Scott Bass would have included more of what I’ve just written (which is mostly what I remember talking about). I think including more of the above may give people a more balancing view of newer neighbors as a whole and lessened the overall tone of the article to one of “the older vs the newer” or even “black vs white” residents. Just my opinon. ;-)

Leave a Reply