Comments on: E. Seminary man charged for backyard shooting

By: DacatoMontana

DacatoMontana — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 06:29:45 +0000

Peopel, these comments are all well and fine. But, and I may be wrong on this, you all might have a pet health problem that might need a vet’s attention. As soon as possible. A friend of mine has three or four cats. All of them are strictly indoor cats. In late Oct., or early Nov., one of the cats got out and was gone for a couple of days. It’s okay, they found the runaway cat a couple of days later. She’s fine. Thing is, this particular cat contracted a bad case of worms and passed them on to the other house cats. People, please take your pets to the vet as soon as posible. Peace and Happy Holidays.

By: Richard

Richard — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 17:07:37 +0000

To the person that has multi handles. I think everyone now knows your motivations regarding your negative posts.

And I’m sure everyone hopes that your son, Emory has made a complete recover from wounds he received after adjusting Mr. Ross’s flood lights. Happy Holidays

By: Scott

Scott — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:43:39 +0000

OK, so I could not resist. It all makes sense to me now. You could say that I had a Eureka moment. Retro-You never told me or even let on that your opinion/observation/accusation was SO BIASED. I just did some research of my own. What a shame, I will never get those 10 minutes of my life back. I think you just proved beyond a doubt everything that I stated. Say anything you want now, it no longer matters to me, it will be falling on deaf ears/eyes

By: PriderockT

PriderockT — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 12:43:03 +0000

To everyone else: May you and yours have a safe and Happy Holidays — whichever one you all may celebrate! ;)

By: PriderockT

PriderockT — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 12:40:48 +0000

” Just an Opinion “, Anonymous? Looks more like an veiled attempt to coerce some people into being quiet. You can have your opinion, others are entitled to theirs. FYI, look up the difference between ” opinion ” and ” observation “.

Something else, here, too. Unless a person has absolutely no access to the internet, and been living, since birth, on some desearted island on another planet,of course their information can be found in public records. That’s why a person’s private records are public.

By: anonymous

anonymous — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 04:47:55 +0000

I really find it odd that all of these post seem to be tied together somehow. (IE a split personality, if you know what I mean) Richard, I think you hit it on the head! A little research on the internet (all public information) lead back to an apartment address of 4828 Chamberlayne Ave, Richmond, VA 23227-3476. It gives a lot more info than this, like a name, phone number and apartment number, but I won’t go that far. I am not that petty.. Why must you be this way? “just an opinion” Happy Holidays!!!

By: PriderockT

PriderockT — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 02:25:10 +0000

Oh, my! Elizabeth, you’re right! It was Scudder! I went back and viewed the post. ( I keep copies on file ). I’ll contact Retrofunk3 and let ‘em know. And, don’t be ashamed of yuorself for remembering something. Not your fault some people are — how did retro3 put it? — pretencious towards other people and their views.

By the way, Scott; I spoke with DakotaMontana. DM said that the post was not an opinion, It was an observation. Yeah, DM has a pecular notion on observations. ( DM is not oringinally from around here, so that person has a rather off-color view of city officials ). But at the same time, may actually have a valid point. Maybe. There is — or was — a city councelperson living back on E. Semenary. And Mr. Ross did get by with essentially a slap on the wrist. Had that been a disadvantaged person from a lower class neighborhood without benefit of a very good attorney, that person would have been jailed. So, this does look more than a little intriguing.

By: Richard

Richard — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 02:16:13 +0000

I just want to see what name Retrofunk3,Priderock and Retrofunkmom comes up with now.

By: Elizabeth

Elizabeth — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:34:55 +0000

S/he argued with Scudder, not Scott, about a perceived slight on the roundabout issue. I am ashamed with myself for even remembering that.

By: Scott

Scott — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 13:31:46 +0000

Retro–Normally I would not respond to your post, but I am bored today. You are reading something into what I wrote, that is not there. I only commented that some of the comments I would moderate more. There is nothing in DAKOTAMONTANA’s comment that says anything about a shooting. It is an accusation, not an opinion. I do value others opinions, however the comment on here, DAKOTAMONTANA’s comment #2 in these series of comments, holds no value, in my opinion. Nor does this comment that I am coping and pasting….posted by BLVD at October 16, 2009 1:11 am :

“FUCK YALL D3M WAS MY NIGGAZ” from the article “Police shut down drug house on Barton Avenue”

I value other opinions, and never said that the news posted here was of no value. I simply stated that I would moderate some of the comments more closely. Especially accusations that add no value and could get someone sued for slander, and actually the administrator of this site be held somewhat liable because he let the accusation remain on the site. And looking at the current posts there are now 2 Scotts…of which I did not write the post #14. And one other thing that bothers me about your last comment. If you had a problem with something I said months ago (round about), you should have brought it up at that time….not several months later, but I actually think you have me confused with someone else. But that is another matter completely. Again, I consider this matter closed, but if you want the last word, I understand, and you may have it. But please read what I have stated and not more into it that what it is. It is not that deep.