<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: City schools plan changes to open enrollment system</title>
	<atom:link href="http://northrichmondnews.com/news/2008/07/26/city-schools-plan-changes-to-open-enrollment-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://northrichmondnews.com/news/2008/07/26/city-schools-plan-changes-to-open-enrollment-system/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 01:12:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: North Richmond News &#187; School board passes open enrollment policy - Richmond, Virginia</title>
		<link>http://northrichmondnews.com/news/2008/07/26/city-schools-plan-changes-to-open-enrollment-system/comment-page-3/#comment-16748</link>
		<dc:creator>North Richmond News &#187; School board passes open enrollment policy - Richmond, Virginia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 20:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://northrichmondnews.com/news/?p=671#comment-16748</guid>
		<description>[...] When we last covered the proposed &#8220;open enrollment&#8221; policy being considered by the Richmond School Board, it generated quite a bit of comment from local residents (126 comments to be exact). Well, the policy passed by an 8-1 vote last Monday night, according to the Times-Dispatch: The Richmond School Board passed its long-awaited new enrollment policy tonight by an 8-1 vote, opening the way for city parents to send their children to any school they choose, beginning next year. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When we last covered the proposed &#8220;open enrollment&#8221; policy being considered by the Richmond School Board, it generated quite a bit of comment from local residents (126 comments to be exact). Well, the policy passed by an 8-1 vote last Monday night, according to the Times-Dispatch: The Richmond School Board passed its long-awaited new enrollment policy tonight by an 8-1 vote, opening the way for city parents to send their children to any school they choose, beginning next year. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gray</title>
		<link>http://northrichmondnews.com/news/2008/07/26/city-schools-plan-changes-to-open-enrollment-system/comment-page-3/#comment-9768</link>
		<dc:creator>gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://northrichmondnews.com/news/?p=671#comment-9768</guid>
		<description>By the way, the Charter contract should be amended and approved.  Expecting the charter to be ADA compliant in one year is completely unfair.  

If RPS had signed a contract like this, we would have to close 50 schools today.  How many years has RPS had to become ADA compliant? 18 years?  How many Richmond Public Schools can folk wheels themselves into?

I say approve this Charter and give them a fair amount of time for ADA compliance, like 3 to 5 years.  I&#039;d like to know of the other unfair things in that contract.

I&#039;m thinking that our representatives want this Charter to fail because we know for a fact that most Richmond Public Schools would have failed under the same conditions and requirements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, the Charter contract should be amended and approved.  Expecting the charter to be ADA compliant in one year is completely unfair.  </p>
<p>If RPS had signed a contract like this, we would have to close 50 schools today.  How many years has RPS had to become ADA compliant? 18 years?  How many Richmond Public Schools can folk wheels themselves into?</p>
<p>I say approve this Charter and give them a fair amount of time for ADA compliance, like 3 to 5 years.  I&#8217;d like to know of the other unfair things in that contract.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m thinking that our representatives want this Charter to fail because we know for a fact that most Richmond Public Schools would have failed under the same conditions and requirements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gray</title>
		<link>http://northrichmondnews.com/news/2008/07/26/city-schools-plan-changes-to-open-enrollment-system/comment-page-3/#comment-9767</link>
		<dc:creator>gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://northrichmondnews.com/news/?p=671#comment-9767</guid>
		<description>What if RPS administration signs a contract, promising to support parents efforts if they choose to use their neighborhood school?  Keep in mind that parents previously looking for a way out of RPS will not approve of street thugs ruling their children, staff breaking the law, for example, promoting one religion in the school, or untrained/unsupported teachers focusing on those academically behind while the rest wait or fall between the cracks.

Yes a contract would be good.

Another good idea that a fellow parent once suggested -have parents fill out exit surveys.  Find out why families are leaving their neighborhood schools.  This would help RPS zone in on problem areas and fix them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if RPS administration signs a contract, promising to support parents efforts if they choose to use their neighborhood school?  Keep in mind that parents previously looking for a way out of RPS will not approve of street thugs ruling their children, staff breaking the law, for example, promoting one religion in the school, or untrained/unsupported teachers focusing on those academically behind while the rest wait or fall between the cracks.</p>
<p>Yes a contract would be good.</p>
<p>Another good idea that a fellow parent once suggested -have parents fill out exit surveys.  Find out why families are leaving their neighborhood schools.  This would help RPS zone in on problem areas and fix them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teacher</title>
		<link>http://northrichmondnews.com/news/2008/07/26/city-schools-plan-changes-to-open-enrollment-system/comment-page-3/#comment-9726</link>
		<dc:creator>teacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 02:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://northrichmondnews.com/news/?p=671#comment-9726</guid>
		<description>Ms. Wolf,

I should probably write this is an email, but I don&#039;t want anyone to think I have a personal vendetta against you.

Having said that, I consider your abstention on the PH Charter initiative one of the most respectful, professional, reasonable, and important actions I am aware of your doing. 

Even if the possibility of a conflict of interest law suit was at the heart of it, I think the division that has developed since the original vote is an indication of a recognition by at least some board members of the lacking, if not conflicting, research of the efficacy of charter schools and the realization of the possibility that the charter school would only further propagate the de facto segregation already evident in our school system.

This very evening, I have spoken with many teachers in RPS who feel that the squeaky wheel gets the grease, but it is important to remember that there are many squeaky wheels that are more like loose cannons. We realize that you are advocating for your precious children. We realize they are precious. However, we know that education and economics has a lot to do with why schools are the way they are. The grand question that we would like to answer is how to solve inequality/inequity in our schools. Unfortunately, many of us have come to the conclusion that there will never be an end to this problem. Perhaps this is due to capitalism. However, we have vowed never to give up fighting for equality and we are making every effort to better understand how to make this a reality. 

The fact a charter school would remove funds from public education via the reduction of enrollment in other public schools is a major reason that anyone who believes in improving public education is important must abstain from supporting charter schools. 

The fact that Mr. Day (I hope I have his name correct) left the meeting saying that &quot;we must consider our legal options&quot; is only a further indication of a position in which the will and effort to improve education is wrongly affected. If Mr. Day spends one dollar fighting the system, one hour rallying against it, it is time and money that would be better spent in improving the very schools that already exist. 

I sincerely hope that people will recognize this force to dis-incorporate from public school will bear fruit only for those whose interests are served by it. We can not continue to try to avoid the negative in our schools. We must face it with full-hearts and bravely work together to say the time has come for our schools to be what everyone knows they can be. There is not a lack in funding as much as there is a lack in priority. We may just have to sacrifice a little something to get what we want. Someone might have to not drink a beer, see a movie, buy a new pair of shoes, get a manicure, go to the golf club, or some other such luxury, so that we may make our schools the priority that they should be, the highest priority.

Mr. Day, are you willing to sacrifice your efforts in one area to improve another? 

Do those of you who fear for your children dare to embrace your neighborhood school and be a part of the team who can proudly say we have chosen to stay when others have ran because we believe that though RPS is in a dark hour, the darkest hour is just before the dawn of a new era? For it is through our schools that we will solve poverty, crime, blight, pollution, and other social ills that no amount of policing, welfare, imprisonment, abandonment, and fear ever will resolve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms. Wolf,</p>
<p>I should probably write this is an email, but I don&#8217;t want anyone to think I have a personal vendetta against you.</p>
<p>Having said that, I consider your abstention on the PH Charter initiative one of the most respectful, professional, reasonable, and important actions I am aware of your doing. </p>
<p>Even if the possibility of a conflict of interest law suit was at the heart of it, I think the division that has developed since the original vote is an indication of a recognition by at least some board members of the lacking, if not conflicting, research of the efficacy of charter schools and the realization of the possibility that the charter school would only further propagate the de facto segregation already evident in our school system.</p>
<p>This very evening, I have spoken with many teachers in RPS who feel that the squeaky wheel gets the grease, but it is important to remember that there are many squeaky wheels that are more like loose cannons. We realize that you are advocating for your precious children. We realize they are precious. However, we know that education and economics has a lot to do with why schools are the way they are. The grand question that we would like to answer is how to solve inequality/inequity in our schools. Unfortunately, many of us have come to the conclusion that there will never be an end to this problem. Perhaps this is due to capitalism. However, we have vowed never to give up fighting for equality and we are making every effort to better understand how to make this a reality. </p>
<p>The fact a charter school would remove funds from public education via the reduction of enrollment in other public schools is a major reason that anyone who believes in improving public education is important must abstain from supporting charter schools. </p>
<p>The fact that Mr. Day (I hope I have his name correct) left the meeting saying that &#8220;we must consider our legal options&#8221; is only a further indication of a position in which the will and effort to improve education is wrongly affected. If Mr. Day spends one dollar fighting the system, one hour rallying against it, it is time and money that would be better spent in improving the very schools that already exist. </p>
<p>I sincerely hope that people will recognize this force to dis-incorporate from public school will bear fruit only for those whose interests are served by it. We can not continue to try to avoid the negative in our schools. We must face it with full-hearts and bravely work together to say the time has come for our schools to be what everyone knows they can be. There is not a lack in funding as much as there is a lack in priority. We may just have to sacrifice a little something to get what we want. Someone might have to not drink a beer, see a movie, buy a new pair of shoes, get a manicure, go to the golf club, or some other such luxury, so that we may make our schools the priority that they should be, the highest priority.</p>
<p>Mr. Day, are you willing to sacrifice your efforts in one area to improve another? </p>
<p>Do those of you who fear for your children dare to embrace your neighborhood school and be a part of the team who can proudly say we have chosen to stay when others have ran because we believe that though RPS is in a dark hour, the darkest hour is just before the dawn of a new era? For it is through our schools that we will solve poverty, crime, blight, pollution, and other social ills that no amount of policing, welfare, imprisonment, abandonment, and fear ever will resolve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gray</title>
		<link>http://northrichmondnews.com/news/2008/07/26/city-schools-plan-changes-to-open-enrollment-system/comment-page-3/#comment-9676</link>
		<dc:creator>gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://northrichmondnews.com/news/?p=671#comment-9676</guid>
		<description>And throw that &quot;Zero Tolerance Disciplanary Policy&quot; in the trash along with the &quot;Three Strikes You&#039;re Out&quot; and the Bush, Jr presidency!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And throw that &#8220;Zero Tolerance Disciplanary Policy&#8221; in the trash along with the &#8220;Three Strikes You&#8217;re Out&#8221; and the Bush, Jr presidency!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
